+1

continuing from the post below:

THIS still sound like a joke because of how hard  it seems to see a reasonable doubt in the intentional killing of that girl which probably could provide a significantly tougher sentencing range. I wonder if errors in finding of facts at this level did not warrant correcting the lower court there what could? Instead of being made into an escape route, the reasoning of this court could have provided a little bit of fall back support even if we assume the defendant did not intend to kill his girlfriend despite the absence of a reasonable doubt.