+3

Look at THIS.How often a bail is given after such conviction and for the price of an IPhone or two?

Also, some say that he was found guilty of murdering his girlfriend and that could be the definition of a misleading statement. No, he was found guilty of murdering a person who happened to be his girlfriend. He was not found guilty of intentionally murdering his girlfriend which the facts seems to be screaming for.

In addition, any doubt in the dishonesty and corruption of this higher court is greatly minimized with a statement like this if the site is correct:

"Leach said although Pistorius had genuine beliefs his life was in danger,.."

So, it was not even seen as being a reasonable doubt but, to this court, it appears to have some how jumped that stage to become an established fact.

Also, remember how the news were reporting that a murder conviction would mean a minimum of 15 years imprisonment according to the South African Law? Now, after that conviction, according to this article the "minimum" appears to have magically transformed into a "maximum" 

"His jail term hasn't been decided, but he faces up to 15 years in prison"

Again, the defense presented does not sound to me anywhere close to put a serious doubt or alter the view of this being a direct killing intended on the victim in her identity.

If you give a free pass on the taking of life what is left? In a just system this defendant probably would had been put to death some time ago.