Thursday, December 24, 2015

+4

The fake court proceedings that handled the case of Trayvon Martin here had to pretend honest jury selection. There, on the other hand, no jury needed even for cases like these and you get everything ready in the system.
The statement mentioned about the defendant having a genuine belief that his life was in danger, if was really stated by the higher court , which is a level I don't even know the lower court had reached beyond that of stating a doubt, was like the million ton object that fall on the back of a camel that needed at max a feather to be broken and crushed it like flour. Did the person who stated such claim of certainty really think he could eclipse facts like these because of his position as a judge?   

No comments:

Post a Comment