Here is a very significant thing those courts there may not have expected or at least wished that the world would take into account.
When wrong verdicts are made by courts in here and other similar places they are generally jury made verdicts. But there not only sentencing comes from the judges, but also the verdict because there is no jury. This means that the trial judge there herself, not a bunch of laymen from different professions, saw a reasonable doubt in that the guy shot dead that girl intentionally targeting her. I was talking with ordinary people in my mind when I said that no reasonable person would see a reasonable doubt here until my perplexity jumped even much further when I remembered today that they do not use the jury system there.
No comments:
Post a Comment