That trial in South Africa, somebody shoots a girlfriend, who was apparently spending the night with him, from behind the bathroom door claiming he thought she was an intruder, are you kidding me? From the beginning this claim sounded like a joke and one could have a hard time avoiding thoughts about a corrupt trial. Now, after a year in prison according to news reports, he was moved to continue his maximum five years sentence in a South African style of house arrest that makes one wonder about extending the privileges to conducting concert tours. This clearly strengthens the suspicion in the honesty of the trial of that claim.
Is it possible that if I know more about the case like those dealing with it I would change my view? I actually think about how if I know more details about that claim I could make a stronger argument. Still however the answer to that question is yes although from my position here I do not see a significant probability for that.
The level of shedding of blood and coming back with any week excuses to cover for it we see in the world these days seems to be making a joke of the concept of real self defense.
No comments:
Post a Comment